Joined
·
240 Posts
Hi everyone
When my dh and I first went to the GP last Sept dh gave two sperm samples which both came back at under 1 million. The first was 800,000 and the second 400,000. Both were undertaken at the local NHS hospital. DH had to make a appointment to drop them off and deliver them within 1 hour of, erh, doing it! They were either frozen or re-fridgerated and assessed later.
So, the results were pretty consistent.
Approx 2 months later, after a few weeks of no alcohol/caffeine and we started vitamins he froze a sample of 12 million on advice of BUPA who felt production might cease altogether given the low numbers.
He subsequently tested at the same BUPA unit at 3m (although were signs of infection which could have reduced numbers) and 8 m on day of our ICSI.
It's hard to believe that his count had improved to 12 m after only a few weeks of not drinking/no caffeine/vitamins. Particularly as it didn't improve further after a solid 4 months on that regime.
I was wondering if the difference could have been caused because the samples were stored before being counted. Whereas the BUPA samples are "drop tested" there and then. Does anyone know?
Also has anyone had a difference between NHS and private counts? I know this sounds improbable, but dp has convinced himself the NHS can't count!
We were very lucky to be successful on our first ICSI attempt and are looking forward to Dec 3 when our baby girl is due.
But these questions niggle at us both. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Claire
When my dh and I first went to the GP last Sept dh gave two sperm samples which both came back at under 1 million. The first was 800,000 and the second 400,000. Both were undertaken at the local NHS hospital. DH had to make a appointment to drop them off and deliver them within 1 hour of, erh, doing it! They were either frozen or re-fridgerated and assessed later.
So, the results were pretty consistent.
Approx 2 months later, after a few weeks of no alcohol/caffeine and we started vitamins he froze a sample of 12 million on advice of BUPA who felt production might cease altogether given the low numbers.
He subsequently tested at the same BUPA unit at 3m (although were signs of infection which could have reduced numbers) and 8 m on day of our ICSI.
It's hard to believe that his count had improved to 12 m after only a few weeks of not drinking/no caffeine/vitamins. Particularly as it didn't improve further after a solid 4 months on that regime.
I was wondering if the difference could have been caused because the samples were stored before being counted. Whereas the BUPA samples are "drop tested" there and then. Does anyone know?
Also has anyone had a difference between NHS and private counts? I know this sounds improbable, but dp has convinced himself the NHS can't count!
We were very lucky to be successful on our first ICSI attempt and are looking forward to Dec 3 when our baby girl is due.
But these questions niggle at us both. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Claire